Constitution-Makıng Methods In Divided Societies: The Coexistence Of Incrementalist And Particıpatory Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11121005

Keywords:

Divided Societies, Constitution-Making Methods, Incrementalist Approach to Constitution-Making, Participatory Constitution-Making.

Abstract

In deeply divided societies, where constitution-making methods are as important as constitutional preferences, there is a need for a more innovative and flexible understanding outside the narrow molds of traditional methods. A process in which controversial issues that divide social groups are referred to ordinary political processes, involving all political actors and encouraging the public to participate directly or indirectly in every stage of the constitution-making process can be functional in removing the burden of new constitutional debates in deeply divided societies. In this context, a constitution-making process that combines incrementalist approach to constitution-making and participatory constitution-making methods should be seen as the first step in bringing deeply divided societies together with constitutional democracies.

References

EDRISINHA, R, “Challenges of Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making: Some Lessons from Nepal”, Journal of Human Rights Practice, Vol. 9, No. 3.

ERDEM, F. H. (2021), “Kutuplaşmış Toplumlarda Aşamalı Anayasa Yapım Yöntemi: Türkiye Örneği”, Türkiye’de Çatışma çözümü ve Anayasa Yapımı, Democratic Progress Institute, London.

GÖNENÇ, L. (2013), “Anayasa Yapım Sürecinde Temel Tercihler”, Prof. Dr. Erdal Onar’a Armağan Cilt 2, (1071-1097), Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.

GÖNENÇ, L. (2011). “TEPAV Anayasa Çalışma Metinleri: Anayasa Yapımı”, TEPAV.

GÖNENÇ, Levent, “Where to Start to Discuss the Constıtutıon? The Importance of Constitutional Engineering in Constitution Debates”, TEPAV, 2011, s. 1-4.

GÜLENER, S., “Anayasa Yapımında Yeni Bir Paradigma: Kapsayıcı, Katılımcı, Uzlaşmacı, Anayasa Yapım Süreçleri ve Çeşitli Örnekler”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt No. 15, Sayı 3, 199-224.

HART, V. (2003), “Democratic Constitution Making”, United States Institute of Peace (USIP) Special Report, Washington.

HOROWITZ, D. L., “Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 25, No. 2, 5-20.

KONTACI, Ersoy, “Demokratik Anayasa Yapımı Teorisinin Krizi: Şili Deneyimi ve Düşündürdükleri”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt No. 13, Sayı 1, 15-44.

LERNER, H., “Constitution-writing in Deeply Divided Societies: The Incrementalist Approach”, Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 16, No. 1, 68-88.

LERNER, H. (2011), Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

LUSTICK, I., “Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism Versus Control”, World Politics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 325-344.

NORDLINGER, E., A., (1972), Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies, Harvard University Press, USA.

O’LEARY, B, (2013), “Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places: An Advocate’s Introduction”, Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places, (1-66), University of Pennsylvania Press, Phiaedelphia.

ÖZBUDUN, E. (2015),Anayasacılık ve Demokrasi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.

ÖZBUDUN, E. (2014), Türkiye’de Demokratikleşme Süreci: Anayasa Yapımı ve Anayasa Yargısı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.

POLAT AKGÜN, D., “Anayasalar, Siyasi Kültür ve Haida Gwaii’nin Ruhu”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt No. 9, Sayı 2.

YOKUŞ, Sevtap, “Bölünmüş Toplumlarda Anayasa Yapımı: Güney Afrika Örneği”, Aurum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt No. 7, 13-27.

Published

2024-03-16

How to Cite

ÖNGÜÇ , B. (2024). Constitution-Makıng Methods In Divided Societies: The Coexistence Of Incrementalist And Particıpatory Approach. Ulusal Ve Uluslararası Sosyoloji Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 5(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11121005